Why teach math history response

 Prior to the reading, I feel that math history seems important to incorporate into my own math teaching, to make the subject feel more grounded in reality and relevant to more students. From my experience, math can be a very abstract topic that students often have difficulty grasping. By connecting the subject to a historical context (perhaps to motivate the lesson as well), I believe that more students would be able to connect to the material presented, as they would have more ways to relate it to their own lives and other topics.

Throughout the reading, once concept I found interesting was exploring math history as a tool for teachers to identify points of friction within student learning (page 211). I have forgotten in some ways what it’s like to learn basic trigonometry or algebra, and thus I can imagine having a hard time understanding why students are stuck on certain steps of learning. I think this gives an interesting way to help solve this disconnect between many teachers and their students. I also really appreciated the perspective of using famous mathematicians as role models to help students not get discouraged by failures, uncertainties or misunderstandings (page 207). Considering math can be a very uncomfortable topic to learn at times, and that it involves a lot of time spent towards making mistakes, I can understand why so many students feel discouraged by the subject and end up avoiding it or hating it. Especially in high school where students are often comparing themselves to one another, bringing in the failures and mistakes of past mathematicians could make learning math appear like a journey with ups and downs rather than a linear path. Hopefully this perspective helps encourage students to be more accepting of feeling vulnerable in the learning process. 

After reading the article, I realize there are many more ways to integrate history of math into the classroom than I had realized, and that the benefits from this integration are also much vaster than I thought. While I liked the idea of integrating math history into my class, I now feel that I have a more ideas to implement it in an actual classroom setting, in a way that hopefully feels natural and interesting to my students.


Comments

  1. Malihe21 September 2026 at 13:19

    Your point about forgetting what it was like to learn basic algebra or trigonometry for the first time really stood out to me. I think this connects well to the article because looking at how these ideas developed historically might help us understand why some concepts that seem simple to us as teachers can actually be difficult for students.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Time calculation readings

Image
I had never really thought deeply about why our system for time was the way it was. This is funny to me because I find I’m so quick to point out that the imperial system is confusing and how it's way easier to use the metric system. I now realize that the metric system is in part more intuitive because it uses the decimal system (and because it’s the system I’ve used my whole life, so I’m used to it). However, since I’ve only had the one way to think about time, I’ve never really thought about why there are 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day, or 12 months in the year. I found it surprising that the article from Scientific America attributed Egyptians to using a base 12 system to develop hours in a day, whereas the article from Mac Tutor claimed that no major civilization used the base 12 system. I was surprised to read that minutes and seconds come from dividing the degrees of latitude and longitude into smaller segments. I’ve never thought about tim...
Read more

Crest of a Peacock Introduction - Reflection

Image
While reading this chapter, I was surprised to find out about how the Greeks attributed the Egyptians to be a significant help in the learning and development of their own mathematics, in contrast with how Europeans claimed that their knowledge came almost solely from the Greeks, and that math used by the Egyptians was dismissed as “little importance to the later history of the subject” (p. 4). This was surprising to me since the text mentions that the Eurocentric model views Europe as the inheritor of Greek heritage, but at the same time the credit that was given by Greek people is ignored by their “descendants”.  I was also surprised by how vast the connections are between different cultures who shared math from the 5th to 15th century. I hadn’t realized how far individuals during this time could and would travel in the pursuit of knowledge. For example, having places like Baghdad and India or Baghdad and Cordoba having direct paths to sharing knowledge (Figure 1.3) is really fas...
Read more